The allegedly sovereign nation of Germany found that their judiciary only has authority to render decisions that globalists approve of. The Cologne District Court heard a case involving a Muslim doctor ruining a circumcision he performed on a 4-year-old Muslim boy in which the court decided “it is a serious and irreversible interference on the integrity of the human body” and that preservation of that human integrity comes first – parents religious freedom comes second, therefore, it should be illegal to have a child circumcised and suggests that at 14 the child may decide whether or not he wants to go through the ritual.
This issue has been debated for some time now in the civilized world. The argument, for the most part, is that the child cannot consent to the procedure legally, being under 18. There have actually been cases in America where men who were circumcised shortly after birth have sued the the doctor for performing the procedure without their consent. Some so-called “experts” believe circumcision to prevent a variety of diseases which critics in the field of urology and pediatrics say no evidence has ever come to light supporting that assertion and that it is an unnecessary practice from a medical standpoint. From an ethical standpoint, it’s a form of genital mutilation forced on children, for the most part. Of course right-wing Jews living outside Germany in other parts of Europe, America, and Israel, who have no right to dictate German law just as Germans have no right to dictate Israeli law, have decided that this law will not stand because it’s an “anti-Semitic” law aimed at persecuting Jews.
Without paying a shred of attention to the case itself or the reasons for the circumcision ban, Rabbi Abraham Cooper of the Los Angeles, California based Simon Wiesenthal Center claimed that no Jew in Germany would allow a German court to stop them from doing the bris ceremony. By this logic, there is nothing for them worry about then because their tradition in Germany will live on despite the law. Since the Jewish Hospital of Berlin has decided to suspend all circumcisions to children, it seems that Cooper was wrong and there were plenty of secular Jewish doctors happy to see a law that gave them the excuse to no longer have to risk a malpractice suit 18 years down the line. Cooper and others though “worry” that the ban will drive the circumcisions underground and that Jews will turn to those not qualified with unsanitary tools to perform the circumcision, but that’s already how they do it for the most part. Most of the religious orthodox/right-wing Jews have a bris where the mohel rabbi who is an unqualified and unlicensed surgeon performs the circumcision in the unsterilized environment of the child’s home in front of many people with potentially dirty tools.
These zionists, so quick to condemn this law as being anti-semitic, do not look at the problems that their circumcision ritual has caused. There is one part of the bris ritual which I neglected to mention which the mohels refuse to give up, leading to disease and in some cases the death of children. According to the New York Times, rabbi Yitzchok Fischer has given a total of 4 infants type 1 herpes during “ritual circumcisions with oral suction.”
“The ritual of oral suction — or in Hebrew, metzitzah b’peh — is practiced almost exclusively in ultra-Orthodox communities and, to a lesser degree, in Orthodox Jewish communities, despite efforts by the city to curtail it and educate communities about its health risks. The procedure occurs during the circumcision ritual of the bris, as the practitioner, or mohel, removes the foreskin of the penis and then sucks the blood from the wound to clean it.”
-Liz Robbins, New York Times March 7, 2012
After giving 3 boys type 1 herpes between 2003-2004, killing one of the children at several weeks old, Fischer was not charged with performing sexual act on a child or murder, but was instead no longer allowed to “perform the ritual.” But on September 28th, 2011, a two week old boy died of type 1 herpes after a bris ritual involving the oral sex act performed by Fischer. While there are some mohels who use a plastic tube to suck out the blood rather than suck the blood directly out the child’s penis, none of the rabbinical authorities or Jews from either school of thought, or Christian zionists (if they even know about this at all) condemned Fischer for performing the oral sex act on the child knowing full well that he had herpes and had already spread it to other children one who died from it. Does anyone call his actions into question? The Simon Wiesenthal Center does not condemn that as anti-Semitic; knowingly spreading sexually transmitted diseases to Jewish infants is about as anti-Jew as it gets.
When they say “diminishing religious freedom,” these Jews are referring to themselves and the Muslims who are are just as upset about the loss of their rights. Sure now the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the Conference of European Rabbis along with probably the World Jewish Congress, potentially the Anti-Defamation League, Christian zionist churches/organizations, and whatever other right-wing Zionist organization has involved themselves stand in solidarity with the Muslims. These organizations even speak of Switzerland’s banning of the burka veil as a sign of Europe revoking religious freedom when it was they that lobbied and pushed to have it banned. They claim to stand in solidarity with the Muslims and their religious freedom now, but where were they when the Muslims wanted airports to provide them a prayer area with a foot shower so they, too, could pray before flights properly? Or where were these organizations more recently during the ground zero Muslim community center madness? In both cases, they were stirring up outrage amongst the masses to the point where a young Jewish guy stabbed a cab driver for being Muslim (due to the frenzy these organizations got everyone into). Not to mention, the Jews whose children contracted herpes would not speak to any investigator about Fischer, but the Muslim father whose son’s circumcision went wrong is the one who sought out this new law in his lawsuit shows that the these right-wing Jewish/Zionist organizations could not care less about the religious freedom of the Muslims, nor do the most European Muslims care about being told they can or cannot force their children to participate in ritualistic circumcision. Therefore there is no point in mentioning the Muslim community any further.
Merkel and the German parliament, following the Israeli parliament’s lead, immediately condemned the courts findings saying that the law will have to be changed because “Germany was not going to be the country who criminalizes Jewish religious rites.” She added that if they did, Germany would be the laughing stock of the world. But those who far from seeing Germany as the laughing stock of the world for this legal ruling were Switzerland, Sweden, Norway, and Finland who plan on adopting the standard set by the Cologne District Court on the practice of ritualistic circumcision of children. Regardless of the arguments put forth and the obvious intentions of the ruling having nothing to do whatsoever to do with taking religious freedom away from the Jews or even the Muslims, Rabbi Abraham Cooper’s stated, “Whether it’s a court in Germany or an elitist group of politicians in Norway or activists in San Francisco trying to protect the health of American youngsters, it all goes back to the same root, [but] the Jewish people’s commitment to brit milah (ritualistic circumcision with oral suction) outlived Stalin, Hitler and all the other tyrants who understood the importance of brit milah to the Jewish people. In the former Soviet Union, Jews put their lives on the line in order to get a brit milah.” The best response to this and best way to articulate the meaning and motivation behind this legal ruling is the one Michael Bloomberg had to the Fischer incident and the horrid practice of Brit milah, “There is probably nobody in public life who fights harder for the separation of church and state than I do, but I just wanted to remind everybody: religious liberty does not simply extend to injuring others or putting children at risk, we will continue working with the community and others to prevent more baby boys from suffering these tragic fates.”
The real issue here is not the infringement of religious freedom but the global community’s infringement of the judiciary of a sovereign nation. Each nation is meant to be a sovereign entity with its own customs, economy, currency, culture, military, innovations, and law. The beauty of this world was (at one point) that if a minority did not like the laws of one nation that they lived in, they could amongst themselves lobby to change it and if not move elsewhere. Instead, nations of the world are shamed, bullied, scared, or subverted into compliance with a global Zionist agenda that is not limited to Germany, Norway, Finland, Switzerland, or Sweden, but one that is dictating the global standard that every nation must abide by. It has stripped away most elements of national sovereignty just about every nation on the planet. The Anglo/Khazar global conquest through globalization takes more and more each day, giving nothing in return. The Anglo/Khazars are vampires sucking out the life blood that is the sovereignty of each nation and these Anglo-Christian and Khazar-Jewish zionists can only succeed if we say nothing and can only fail if point out each time they feed and expose them.